Superior acting and a great ending! August 7, 2000
After watching the 1987 version, I was very disappointed with
the acting and decided to definitely watch the 1993 production.
The acting is superior and the setting more realistic. If
someone could take the best qualities of both movies and put
them into one, to me that would be the perfect Secret Garden
movie.
The 1987 version taught lessons more easily to younger
children, while this newer one will be enjoyed more by older
children and adults. Colin's father (played by John Lynch) is a
much more human portrayal. We can truly empathize with his
sorrow and Colin's need to have his father in his life.
Mary Lenox was also played in a more serious light by Kate
Maberley. She portrayed her character extremely well. Her story
begins in India and we learn she is emotionally neglected, yet
spoiled and physically well taken care of. She loses her parents
in a massive earthquake. (In the 1987 film it is a plague.)
Since she can no longer stay in India, she is literally
shipped off to her uncle. As she enters the monstrosity of a
castle, we feel she is doomed to be neglected, hated and locked
away. Even Mrs. Medlock (the housekeeper played by Maggie Smith)
is not impressed or sympathetic. Mary is told "not to go
wandering and poking about." Mary's natural curiosity
compels her to discover a way out of her room and soon she finds
secret doors, staircases, rooms and gardens.
At first Martha (a maid) is her only friend, then she soon
learns to like Martha's brother Dikon. He shares her love of
gardening. Martha and Dikon seem to be the only truly happy
characters for the entire first half of the movie. All the
actors have wonderful accents and reveal the positive and
negative aspects of each character.
When Mary meets Colin, she has in fact met her match. He is
her cousin who is bedridden, spoiled and annoying! His
hysterical screeching makes him most unlovable. Mary shows Colin
that nothing is impossible when you put your mind to it. She
also says something profoundly beautiful at the end of the
story.
I found the magic spell casting in this version a bit intense
in comparison to the 1987 version, where dancing around the fire
was a fun time. There is something about the 1987 version which
I think appeals more to children, as the characters seem to have
a bit more fun overall. This 1993 version has a much better
ending. I recommend this version for those who want a
high-quality movie, and the 1987 version for those who can
overlook the acting. I think there is something to be learned
from both movies.